Mingled With Scripture
This posting is not intended to give offense, but it will. Please read the whole thing before deciding.
We are all reading the same scriptures. Yet we pick and choose scriptures to support worldly philosophies we are already in love with.
Marxism
Some in the church preach Marxism, mingling it with the words of King Benjamin.
This is wresting of the scriptures and an affront to one of the best men who ever lived. Benjamin must now be grieved to hear us use his words to promote the plan of Satan. This is an excessive yet real example of people using one scripture to justify a belief in the New York Times. Some develop this pernicious belief because they have been brainwashed by propaganda (they hear Sunday school lessons once a week, but school lectures five times a week). Some do because they are “part of the system,” working for a collectivist organization and fear that “if we leave his employ, what will become of us?” Some just lack the gift of discernment, so cannot judge between good and evil.
The Ten Commandments forbid stealing. If we steal from the middle class to give to the poor, however needy they may be, we are stealing.
On the other hand, many members use the words “idler shall not eat the bread of the laborer” to justify withholding their substance from the poor, in direct violation of Benjamin’s counsel to share without judging. If someone struggles financially, we think the person must be an idler, or was an idler earlier in life so was too lazy to get an education. But in fact we cannot know the whole story. It is impossible. That’s why Benjamin expressly told us not to pass judgment on other people’s financial situations.
Martial Spirit
Many in the church feel that the Way of the Warrior is righteous, and the thirst for the blood of our enemies is pious. They cite Captain Moroni’s defense of freedom to justify hatred and war lust. This is also pulling out one example from the scriptures and applying it to a worldly philosophy.
Moroni was a righteous man who exerted extreme courage when his liberty was threatened. But he also knew that the Lord would not justify his aggression. He was to always act in defense.
When I was growing up, I would watch R-rated movies if they were so rated only because of violence, but would not watch anything containing nudity. That policy has since been stopped by the realization that violence is repugnant to the Lord. When the Nephites became wicked, they were immoral. But at the end, when they reached the very depth of their depravity, they became insensitive to violence. That is when they needed to be destroyed. Callousness to violence is not only unrighteous, it can be the extreme level of unrighteousness.
Environmentalism
Some in the church believe that environmentalists are called by God to declare repentance unto us. Confusing “stewardship of the earth” with “pretending to care for the earth in order to destroy liberty” should not be difficult but apparently is for some.
This is no different from the children of Israel worshipping Ba’al, then adding in the hollow forms of true ceremonies to give justification to false worship. Worshiping the true and living God, in the way He has prescribed, is actually easier because it does not require us to continually rationalize out behavior.
Maybe the warming of the earth trend that began 10,000 years ago was caused by SUVs. Maybe the general cooling trend of the past few years proves global warming is not valid, Either way, this writer is unconcerned. What is concerning is the tendency to adopt a worldly philosophy, then justifying that belief with a scripture either taken out of context or misapplied.
New Age Healing
Other religions and philosophies can be useful in facilitating emotional healing from the effects of abuse and trauma. But why push a handcart, now that the automobile has been invented? The gospel of Jesus Christ can heal emotional and spiritual wounds from trauma FASTER than the various new age “modalities” so popular now. But it does require adherence to truth and behavior.
The new age philosophy has two problems. First, it is amoral. It allows you to “just be true to yourself” or “ask the universe to give you whatever you want,” regardless of what the Lord wants. The second problem is that it is based on Hinduism. We are not Hindu. We worship the true and living God. We declare: “he that hath eternal life is rich.” That is far superior to “abundance,” which is generally used to “attract” money to one’s self. Money is cheap compared to what we can potentially have.
I have heard people in the church use new age healing scripts, awkwardly adding in the name of Christ. They are essentially chanting Hindu-based prayers, substituting the name of Lord Shiva with the name of Jesus Christ. If done extensively, it can bring relief from pain. But this writer believes that yanking the logo off a Cadillac and gluing it to a Kia does not make the cheap car a Cadillac. A better option is to park the Kia across the street, search through the miscellaneous utility drawer in the kitchen until the garage key is located, and begin driving the Cadillac long locked up in the garage.
Racism
One of the political parties in the U.S. fought the other party to abolish slavery, desegregate schools, bring civil rights to African-Americans, and equalize all citizens before the law. The other party, literally late to the party, established social policies that rob African-Americans of self-respect and thwart their family ties. (According to a growing body of research by black scholars, African-American family ties were stronger than white families prior to LBJ’s programs). But the later party has somehow convinced us all that they are the party of civil rights.
However, the problem is not who gets credit, but that some of those who identify themselves with the first party have not only fallen for this reasoning, they further believe racism is justified in order to be loyal to their own party. This is not just inaccurate based on the civil rights record, but it is evil, because we believe that all are children of God. This reasoning is a lie based on another lie. Double bad.
Church of the Devil
Categorizing another church, movement, or person as “the church of the devil” is contrary to what the Book of Mormon tells us. The Church of the Devil is a general philosophy that fights the Kingdom of God. It destroys liberty, encourages immorality, and seeks to perpetuate itself. It is the basis of many trends, but is not the name of a specific group. Applying it to someone else is usually done in anger, not under inspiration. A better explanation was given by Elder Neil A. Maxwell, which can probably be googled.
These are a few man-made philosophies that I see justified by the mingling of scripture. Others undoubtedly exist. I am probably doing the same thing myself. I’m waiting to decide what I believe until I can read the op-ed page of tomorrow’s New York Times.

